Posts Tagged ‘violence’

Family Violence Healing: 3 Keys to Healing Parental Alienation

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

When children go away to college and get away from “who and what” the controlling family members want them to be, a window opens up. What they discover is their essence. Now here’s the gem…

That essence is a composite of their formative years. If you were in their lives during this time, good chance you can slip back in and they can be in yours.

3 Keys to Healing Parental Alienation

There are some key things you will want to do and things you’ll be best avoiding in order to rekindle your relationship with your children if you are an estranged parent.

1) Focus on what you have, and what you had, with them; not what you don’t have or what you missed. To help you maintain this focus, find points of shared sweet sentiment and build out from here.

2) Trust that they don’t need to understand all the elements surrounding your absence to feel their love for you and yours for them. It is already there. Always know these so-called “elements” of your story must be digested as they can be assimilated…and not a moment before.

3) Don’t expect them to give you back what you lost. They can’t. They don’t hold what you lost, as they lost it too.

If you are reading this, I assume you are (or know) a battered mother who weathered battling the system to secure justice for yourself and your children.

On this note…know it was never about them anyway. Rather, it’s about you and the strength you bring to the table to endure the challenges before you.

Healing Comes from Within

A dear friend reading the above, written as a self-contained article, noted how important and powerful those 3 keys are. And further she pointed out, how helpful those words would have been for me to hear when I first encountered parental alienation.

I thought to myself, had these words been told to me, I would not have heard them…not deeply and certainly not from the place that the healing I needed could embrace them.

Healing Is a Process

No one could have told me those words with the same healing impact that they represent. Those words were the telling of me to me…of my process…of my process of coming to grips with all that I encountered over the last decade.

My hope for you is that these words spark your healing process…your mending from family violence and legal domestic abuse.

Healing is not something done to someone, healing is done from, and within, someone. HonorArticle Submission, support and find ways to facilitate your healingfor yourself and for all those whose lives are touched by you.

Domestic Violence and Child Custody – From the Frying Pan to the Fire of Family Violence

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

Can we bring justice to family courts? That’s a highly political question, and I think the answer has more to do with the nature of the human beings behind the system and the misconceptions of those using the system to seek safety.

We hear of battered women falling through the cracks of the system as much as those securing safety through the system. It is clear that those who fall through the cracks typically are in proceedings with a batter fortified with aggressive counsel, or being victimized by counsel, and in some cases both.

Thus, as long as divorce law is about one party annihilating another, mindless of the interest of children and family as a whole, then economically disadvantaged survivors of domestic abuse are subject to system failures.

Is Family Court the Proper Place to Seek Remedy for Domestic Violence?

It is also true that part of the dilemma is that divorce court is actually not the proper jurisdiction to secure remedy for domestic abuse. In divorce court in which there is a “no fault” presumption, responsibility for the marital dissolution is spread across the marriage.

The implication of this is that the perpetrator is given an umbrella to hide under and a way to deflect assuming responsibility for the battering behavior. Further and more equally serious, the victim is expected to shoulder aspects of the battering relationship that technically do not belong to her/him. And even worse is the ongoing legal permission to re-victimize the victim through legal judicial and psychiatric ploys.

How Can Legal Domestic Abuse Be Legal?

You know that abuse is about control. Well, so is litigation. Two parties in a legal action are essentially fighting for control, and the perpetrator thrives in this arena.

Now when there’s a gross disparity of income between the parties and when the perpetrator controls the family purse strings, which is often the case in these relationships/situations, then the litigation can really be controlled because he who pays will most likely drive the litigation.

This party can taunt, torment and terrorize his/her opposition with legal stalking, financial starve out tactics and with the threat of custody litigation. Abusers know nothing will devastate their victims as much as seeing their children endangered. So they use the threat of obtaining custody to extract agreements to their liking. And this can go on indefinitely.

So instead of looking to change the family court system, or expect the family court to serve you differentlyComputer Technology Articles, see it for what it is and seek to employ other strategies in conjunction with family court to arrest the domestic abuse and secure safety for yourself and your children.

Family Violence – Cognitive Dissidence and the Puppet Child

Monday, September 7th, 2009

The saddest part of family violence and the legal abuse syndrome is the impact on children, both on them and within them. When a child is severed from their protective parenta silent epidemiclife for this child is never the same.

First, they are led to believe that the protective parent abandoned them. From this, they are to conclude that this protective parent “really” doesn’t love them.

The net result of this thinking is: on a core level, they are not lovable. Well, this is quite a burden for a child to bear.

However, children like adults naturally seek to resolve the cognitive dissidence inherent in this internal dilemma. Before I go on to elaborate further, let’s step back and define cognitive dissidence.

What is Cognitive Dissidence?

“Cognitive dissidence” is a psychological term referring to the tension state in which our “beliefs,” “feelings” and “actions” are incongruent. That is, when these three aspects of our existence are not in-sink.

So for example, a child (let’s say a young boy) believes his mother (the person more often in this situation) abandoned him. Yet, he feels deep in his being her loving connection to him and his to her, and his actions are to seek her out. Ouch!!!

The tension grows as this inner disharmony lingers. So, what then happens? The psyche seeks to resolve the disharmony by attempting to bring the three elements into congruence…into harmony.

How Do We Resolve Cognitive Dissidence?

Typically this is done by redefining each of these elements just as one re-calculates a mathematical operation. How do they get redefined? As with most things in life, one moves to the direction of the loudest voice, the more pervasive input, the more “in-your-face” perspective.

I bet you’re getting the way the child must resolve the cognitive dissidence in this situation. With mother physically out of the picture and father’s (plus his full family) ongoing input and ability to regulate the child’s entire rewards system, the child will do what?

Obviously the child will let the beliefs set the norm, and both feelings and actions will follow suit to harmonize all three so as to reflect the dominant current input. And thereby, move to resolve the cognitive dissidence.

Long Term Danger for the Puppet Child

But here’s the danger later in life for the child. When this child changes the actions, there can be so much external, positive reinforcement that doing so is almost effortless. New action – withdraw from mom.

But the feeling part, well that’s the part that tricks you up every time. Because even though the child will swallow the loving feeling for his mother at least externally, these feelings lie dormant within. And the result of this is an incomplete resolution of the cognitive dissidence…a “puppet child.”

Now I wish there was an upbeat, hopeful way to end this article, but I’m afraid there isn’t. There is howeverFree Web Content, some advice I can share with anyone who is an estranged parent or has a puppet child.

It’s not about you! Your experience of your inner well-being must not require your child’s efforts to resolve his/her cognitive dissonance to be any way other than the way it is.

Domestic Violence Divorce – Lost Mothers, Lied to Children and the Legal Abuse Syndrome

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Drugs And Violence In Public Schools

Wednesday, December 24th, 2008

Put twenty teenagers in the same room, or hundreds of teenagers in the same school, and you have a breeding ground for violence. Young boys and girls have raging hormones and budding sexuality, and male teenage testosterone levels are high. Teenagers are in the half-child, half-adult stage of life and often lack judgment and are emotionally immature.

Pack these teenagers together into cramped little classrooms, six to eight hours a day, and you have a mixture that can lead to trouble. It’s inevitable that violence will break out—it’s built into the system.

Also, even the most conscientious teacher is usually too busy and overworked to give children the individual attention they need. Critics of home-schooling often say that home-schoolers don’t get proper socialization. However, so-called socialization in public schools is often cruel and violent. Bullying, peer pressure, racial cliques, sexual tensions, and competition for the teacher’s approval all create a stressful, sometimes violent environment.

Compulsory-attendance laws also contribute to violence in the schools. In most states, these laws force children to stay in school until they are sixteen years old or graduate high school. Teenagers who hate school, or are aggressive or potentially violent sociopaths, can’t leave. As a result, they often take out their hatred and aggression on other students. Those children want to learn are forced to endure bullying and violence by these troubled teens.

Also, the law is on the side of violent or disruptive students who are classified as “disabled.” In 1975, Congress passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Based on this legislation, in 1988 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could not remove disruptive disabled children from classrooms without a parent’s consent. If parents don’t consent, teachers are out of luck. Those ‘disabled’ children who are socially impaired, can’t get along with other kids, or sometimes turn violent, therefore fall under this category. Of course, this adds yet another layer of potentially violent children who teachers can’t remove from class.

Violence in public schools can literally kill your child. In the 2000-2001 school year, students were victims of about 1.9 million nonfatal violent crimes such as rape, assault, and robbery. This figure equals about 9,000 violent incidents every school day throughout America, or about one every three seconds.

Public schools are also a drug pusher’s heaven. Thousands of teenagers, pushed by intense peer-pressure, smoke, drink beer, and try marijuana or hard drugs. Schools put hundreds of children together in one big building or courtyard. Mix in overworked or indifferent teachers who have little time or desire to supervise extracurricular activities. That’s why drug pushers circle schoolyards like vultures. Where else can they find groups of vulnerable victims all herded together for their convenience? Is it any wonder that drug and alcohol use is a major problem in public schools?

In the 2001-2002 school year, 34.9 percent of tenth-grade students surveyed said they had smoked cigarettes within the past year. Fifty-one and two tenths percent said they had drunk beer, and 33.4 percent said they got bombed on that beer. Also, 29.8 percent of the same tenth-grade students said they had smoked marijuana within the past year, and 78.7 percent of these marijuana users said they got “bombed or very high” on it.

When children are home-schooled, parents can advise and watch over their kids. At home, there is no peer pressure to try drugs, as there is in public schools. Drug pushers don’t hover around private residences.

Parents should therefore ask themselves: Do my children belong in violent, drug-infested public schools? Are there other education options for my children? In “Public Schools, Public Menace,” I discuss many qualityHealth Fitness Articles, low-cost education options parents can use right now if they decide to take their children out of public school.

Article Copyrighted ฉ 2005 by Joel Turtel.

Domestic Violence is Alive and Well

Saturday, August 23rd, 2008

Domestic violence is a particularly grim topic and a vicious crime, because it involves pain and suffering (even loss of life) inflicted by a friend, someone who claims to care, or a so-called loved one.

Many people ask, “Why don’t the victims just leave? Why do they stay?”The Abuse We Don’t SeeUsually by the time the physical abuse starts in a relationship, the emotional and psychological abuse has already destroyed all the dignity and self-esteem of the victim.

Victims feel ashamed and are embarrassed to tell others about their situations. They are fearful of leaving because of threats from their abusers and financial dependence.

In many instances, victims are manipulated to believe they deserve this treatment and it is somehow their fault. Abusers know exactly what to say and do to keep the abused in emotional captivity.

Victimizing the VictimVictims view leaving as being more painful than staying, because of the imagined and real repercussions either from the perpetrator or from society at large.

Many people in the world still don’t understand domestic violence. Therefore, they victimize the victim further by blaming the victim or making comments like: “You should have just left.

” “I would never be so stupid as to stay in an abusive relationship.

” “That would never happen to me.

“People make jokes in our society about men “getting over” or using women — men who are ” Players.

” Even today, there are still groups of people who have the mindset that women are not equal to men and are just sexual objects.

ControlDomestic violence is about control — being mentally controlled by a significant other. That is the reason why, after leaving an abusive relationship, a victim will go back to her abuser an average of four times before she decides she has the mental strength to leave for good.

Now What?I believe the remedy for domestic violence lies in building a society in which we honor ourselves. When we honor ourselves, it is difficult to dishonor someone else or to be dishonored. Yeah, easier said than done.

We can start with our children and try to stop domestic violence by educating the new generations.

Teach Our ChildrenTell our children how wonderful they are. Tell our girls and our boys from the time they are born that they are glorious miracles. Teach them to love, respect, and celebrate who they are — just because. Teach them that we all come from one wonderful source. Teach them that each of us can only be as strong as the weakest among us.

Teach our children how to honor by honoring them. Teach our children how to respect themselves by respecting them and respecting ourselves. Teach our children that to love someone — being in love — is to encourage each other to be free and to support each other in expressing and exploring all of the wonderful possibilities in life.

Teach them that love is not about control. Love is about wanting the very best for all concerned.

In the Meantime In the meantime, let’s start by at least acknowledging that domestic violence does exist and is a major problem in our society. It knows no economic, racial, religious, gender, or educational boundaries. Let’s take it out of the closet and deal with it. Talk about it. Tell somebody about it.

Support your local shelters and any programs in your community that are about helping to save the lives of victims of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and psychological and emotional abuse. They need our help. By helping them, we are helping ourselves.

The PriceAccording to a report from the American Medical Association, family violence costs this nation from 5 to 10 billion dollars annually in medical expenses, police and court costs, shelters and foster care, sick leave, absenteeism, and non-productivity.

Educate YourselfEducate yourself, your loved ones, your friends, your neighbors, and, of course, your children. If you are in an abusive relationship, know that there is life after abuse.

Know the Warning Signs

• If you meet a man who says, “Yes, I’ve hit women in the past, but they made me do it,” RUN.

• Avoid anyone who rushes you into a firm commitment very early in the relationship.

• Think twice about committing to someone who says, “I cannot live without you.”

• If you’re in a relationship where you feel you have to watch what you say — you are not comfortable being yourself, because you don’t want to upset him or be criticized — know that this is not a good thing.

• If you’re in a relationship with someone who wants to know what your every move is — he interrogates you about where you were, who you were with, and what happened — run.

• Think twice before you get into a relationship with someone who never takes the blame for anything – if according to him, it is always somebody else’s fault.

• No matter how flattered you feel that someone wants you all to himself (disrupting relationships with friends and family), this is a serious warning sign.

• There are many other signs that can alert us to be cautious about continuing a relationship with a certain person.

Many times we see the writing on the wall, but for some reason, we refuse to read it until it’s too late.

Don’t SettleDon’t be a “settler.” By this, I mean, don’t just settle for any relationship for any reason. Know what you want and know especially what you don’t want in a relationship, ahead of time.

Stop Domestic ViolenceWe are miraculous individuals. Many of us have “beat the odds” more than once. We have done what some said could not be done. We’ve moved forward when we thought we were stuck. We have faced challenges and walked through them with our heads held high.

Surely, together, we can end this unnecessary pain and suffering. We can move domestic violence out of our lives.

I believe we do have the power and the ability to build a society in which we honor ourselves. When we honor ourselves, it is difficult to dishonor someone else or to be dishonored.

Note: Although in this article I speak specifically of women as victims of domestic violenceBusiness Management Articles, please understand that many men are also victims of family and relationship violence.

Violence on TV continues unabated: How concerned parents can respond

Monday, August 18th, 2008

Between 1998 and 2005, the number of violent incidents on prime time network TV grew by 75%.  There is now an average of 4.41 instances of violence per hour during prime time, according to a recently released report by the Parent’s Television Council.  Those statistics do not include the increase in violence on cable TV, which would probably drive the numbers higher.

For anyone watching TV, these numbers probably do not come as too much of a shock.  However, given the plethora of studies which document the negative results of watching violent TV, it is surprising that this trend towards more violence has continued unabated.

TV violence causes short-term aggression, fear, and desensitization

TV is not so strong an influence that all children who watch will grow up to be murderers and criminals. Nonetheless, according to the American Psychological Association, they may:

• Become less sensitive to the pain and suffering of others• Be more fearful of the world around them• Behave in aggressive or harmful ways toward others• Be less likely to see anything wrong with violence

In one study done at Pennsylvania State University, researchers observed approximately 100 preschool children both before and after watching television. Some watched violent cartoons, and others watched completely non-violent programs.

The children who watched the violent cartoons, were “more likely to hit out at their playmates, argue, disobey class rules, leave tasks unfinished, and were less willing to wait for things” than those children who watched nonviolent programs, according to Aletha Huston, Ph.D.

TV Violence causes long term aggression

Watching violence on TV may also have serious long-term consequences. According to a long-term study by Dr. Leonard D. Eron, watching television violence at age 8 was the strongest predictor of aggression 22 years later–stronger even than exhibiting violent behavior as children. The groundbreaking study statistically controlled for initial aggressiveness, intelligence, and social class.

A later study of students from the first through the fourth grade reached similar frightening conclusions. Men, who were heavy viewers of violent TV shows as children, were twice as likely as males, who were light viewers of violent TV, to push, grab, or shove their spouses and three times as likely to be convicted of criminal behavior by the time they were in their early 20s. Women who were heavy viewers of violent programs as children were more than twice as likely as other women were to have thrown something at their spouse and more than four times as likely as other young women to have punched, beaten or choked another adult.

What’s a concerned parent to do?

So, as a concerned parent, you have decided to take more firm control of your child’s TV viewing.  However, depending on the v-chip may not be enough.  The Parents’ Television Council Report also notes that the rating system for the v-chip is flawed and unreliable.  If you want to help limit your child’s exposure to TV violence, you will have to:

1.  Regularly watch your child’s favorite shows to make sure they are acceptable to you.

2.  Permanently remove any TVs from your child’s bedroom.  It is too easy to lose touch with what your child is watching.  Enterprising youngsters can often override parental controls too. 

3.  Cut back on the amount of time your entire family watches TV and spend that time together.  Quality family time is a great antidote to disturbing TV images.  It reinforces the belief that your child is safe and loved.  It also helps provide a more solid moral foundation.

These seemingly small steps can make a world of difference to your child.  It can set him or her on a healthier, less violent path – no matter what garbage the networks show on TV.

Sources:

http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/violencestudy/exsummary.asp

http://www.apa.org/pi/pii/vio&tv.html

Frederick J. Zimmerman, PhD; Gwen M. Glew, MD; Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH; Wayne Katon, MD “Early Cognitive Stimulation, Emotional SupportComputer Technology Articles, and Television Watching as Predictors of Subsequent Bullying Among Grade-School Children.” Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:384-388.

School Violence, Drugs and the Devil’s Brew!

Monday, July 14th, 2008

To my slightly used brain it doesn’t appear that there is any real sanity in the world today, much less in the hallways of our schools. Kids today are not really a lot different from the ones I knew back in my high school years, except they have a few more challenges than I did when I was a teen.

While we had alcohol, we didn’t have to deal with it because we knew our parents would deal with us if they found that we were even in the presence of the devil’s brew. Growing up a good Southern Baptist, my mother believed that imbibing in beer, wine or whiskey was a mortal sin. As a result, the kids of my crowd in high school didn’t have much contact with drinking.

Drugs definitely were not a problem at our old high school, probably because most of us didn’t know anything about them. All we knew about heroin was what we saw on the huge screen at the drive-in and judging from the hell addicts on the screen were enduring, it didn’t seem to be worth the effort to even experiment with such a thing.

We wouldn’t have known where to find it even if we’d wanted to give it a try. Drugs, to us, were something the doctor gave you when you broke your arm or when the dentist was going to pull a tooth. We weren’t bombarded every day with television programming depicting dopers and drugs.

School violence today is a very scary concern for students and parents alike. There are many reasons for young people to kill each other today, but most of them have to do with drugs. In the high school years of my past, there was only one reason for a fight, always with fists and never with a gun or knife. Girls!

If violence had erupted in school yards back then, it would have been because of a girl! A guy’s honor had to be avenged if there had been a perceived encroachment into the vows of “going steady.” There was a lot of posturing back then, but I can’t remember a single fight. I would have remembered one, if only for the entertainment value.

The same thing happens today, just as it has since the beginning of time. But girls today are different. They’re all movie stars! Girls back then simply didn’t look as they do today. If today’s girls had appeared on our school yards, we would have thought they’d gotten there by way of a time machine! Violence is certainly more serious than it was at my old high school.

I can’t remember there ever being a serious fight from the time I was in the first grade until I graduated from high school. Sure, there was a certain amount of posturing by boys during that time, but I can’t recall a single punch being thrown. Maybe there was violence, but since it wasn’t scattered all over television, we never knew about it.

There was a menacing collection of characters that was called the rock gang, assumingly because they sat on a rock wall on the edge of the school ground, jeering and taunting anyone who walked within shouting distance. After a while they became more of a joke than a threat.

Today’s’ school shootings appear to have much darker motives than someone’s love life being toyed with by an outsider. Reasons for these atrocities range from someone emptying a shotgun into a crowded classroom because they were failing algebra, to slaughtering classmates in the hallway because the devil told them to do it!

A lot has been written about our “troubled teens”, but I can only recall one guy that you could classify as “troubled”. His nickname was Nickel Nelson because everyone he approached he shouted at them to “Gimme a nickel!” He would then roll his eyes, shake maniacally, then spit on the ground and shriek, “Gimme a nickel!” Everyone gave him a nickel! Twenty years later I heard that he owned a large Chevy dealership in Kentucky, an AA baseball team, hockey team and a Division II Arena football team. He was our most “Troubled Teen”. Who knew?

Video Games and Violence: Who is to Blame?

Thursday, July 10th, 2008

The debate over the prevalence of violence in children who play violent video games versus those who do not has been raging for as long as violent video games have been in existence. Who is really to blame for children who become increasingly violent? Is it really all the fault of video games or is there more to it than placing the blame on an inanimate object?

While children who play violent video games may have more exposure to โ€œactiveโ€ violence than those who do not is it really fair to place the blame on the game itself? Where do parents come in on all of this? Isnโ€™t it the parent who hands the child the game in the first place? Isnโ€™t it the parent who sits their child in front of a video game console for babysitting purposes whilst they are elsewhere catering to their own lives? When you take a look at potential contributing factors in children who show a tendency towards violence it really is doubtful that video gaming is to blameโ€ฆor at least it is not the only thing to blame. With the many contributing factors of parental guidance (or lack there of,) Newspaper stories, News broadcasts, Books, Videos, DVDโ€™s, Societal interaction and DVD and TV productions it is extremely unlikely that violent video games are the only reason that children often become aggressive.

The primary factor in determining a childโ€™s moral guidelines in my personal opinion is the regulation of that childโ€™s behavior by parents or guardians. With the lack of parental guidance children are not put on the right path, nor are they taught what is socially acceptable as far as behavior. Children who are never taught to act in a way that is socially responsible can hardly be expected to know how to do so by sitting down in front of the television or a video game to learn how to interact. If a child is taking social cues from video games and movies of course they are going to pick up their behavioral patterns from those things as opposed to the vacant parental figures. Even though these behavior patterns may be imprinted from video games, it is not the fault of the games themselves for imprinting the child; it is the fault of the parent for not imprinting their own child with the correct sequences of socially acceptable behaviors in the first place. A child who has been taught right from wrong and behaviors that are socially acceptable is a child who can identify these unacceptable behaviors when they are viewed in various forms of media.

It is perfectly accurate to say that children can pick up violent tendencies from playing video games and watching various forms of violent media; however, the assumptions that these behaviors are the fault of the game are absolutely ludicrous. Violent behaviors from media sources are going to stick only when the correct โ€œprogrammingโ€ as it were has not been instilled in a child. When a child is unsure of what is expected of them in certain situations he or she can hardly be blamed for taking cues from his/her surrounding environment and experiences.

Violence on Overkill

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

Iโ€™m a horror movie fan. Yes, I find some twisted pleasure in being scared out of my wits. Somewhere along the line (the tightrope of adolescence, that is) the suspense and thrills of horror films equaled comfort.

However, the last film I watched in a theater did not leave me terrified by what was on the screen. The true shock was occurring in the theater itself. I counted at least five children, all under the age of ten (some considerably younger) sitting alongside their parents. This movie was rated R by the MPAA and for good reason. Language and themes played a part in the rating, but the major reason was the violence. Even if this had been tamed down to a PG-13 rating (what part of 13 donโ€™t these parents get?) I still would have been appalled. I wanted to approach all of these parents and ask them if they understood the ramifications of their actions. But then I would have had to explain what the word โ€œramificationsโ€ means and the whole point would be lost.

Stupidity is rampant and creates a slippery slope. The trait is passed down to their children without concern for their future. Itโ€™s difficult for me as a logical, semi-intellectual father to even understand the thought process someone would use to justify bringing a child into an R rated film.

Are we really that pathetic of a society that we need to have someone at the door of the theater explain โ€œpsychological damageโ€ to a parent with a toddler in tow, waiting to check out the latest Texas Chainsaw Massacre? I hope not, but itโ€™s looking more and more like that may be the case.

Perhaps we need to treat films like Disneyland rides. You must be this tall to see this movie. Or, better yet, we can equip theater chairs with electro-shock capabilities and any parent caught bringing their seven-year-old to an R rated movie gets zapped. And zapped. And zapped again.

Unfortunately, those solutions are just pie-in-the-sky fantasy. The only viable answer (at least in the near future) is for parents to get educated on the emotional differences between a child and an adult, the capacity of a child to differentiate reality and fantasy, and the ways in which violence can affect the growth process of a child. According to the American Medical Association, young children are especially susceptible because they are easily impressionable, cannot discern motives for violence, and (most importantly) learn by observing and imitating. Several medical groups agree that increasingly violent entertainment has the following negative repercussions: Children will increase anti-social and aggressive behavior. They may become less sensitive to violence and those who suffer from violence. They may view the world as violent and mean, becoming more fearful of being a victim of violence. They will desire to see more violence in entertainment and real life and they will view violence as an acceptable way to settle conflicts (Congressional Public Health Summit, 2000).

Until we, as a society, work on limiting our childrenโ€™s exposure to violent films, the disturbing trends will continue. I suppose until changes occur I will keep renting DVDโ€™s and keep me own house in order.

I hope you will do the same.