Posts Tagged ‘controversy’

The Controversy over Infant Potty Training

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

For new and young parents, the concept of infant potty training is really causing some doubts whether this method is really worth the efforts. While this concept seems extreme to some conservative parents, it’s not a relatively new idea. In the early part of 20th century, it was a trend where most young children are already toilet trained by the age of 18 months. In the other parts of the world like Asia, babies are already trained well enough before turning two.

The objective of the idea of infant potty training is to toilet train the infant at such a very young age, even beginning the training from birth. It has caused some opposing views on the topic. Most experts from the medical field agree that at this stage, the infant is not yet physically ready for the development required to really learn to control the bladder movement. In this method, it is mostly the parent who is taught how to hold the infant on until the infant successfully goes.

Anti-infant-potty-training groups emphasize the futility of forcing the child to be trained something even before the child is ready for these trainings. They relate this situation to teaching an infant how to walk just right after birth. The baby is obviously not ready and, for them, the moment spent holding an infant on the potty seat is just a complete waste of time.

Proponents of the method claim there are many benefits to infant potty training. Infant potty training can be a form of bonding for the baby and the mother; it allows the infant to feel the mother more comfortably through this bonding time together. This concept lets the baby to be more independent thereby reducing diaper waste.

But does infant potty training really work? Yes, the method really works for those who believe in it and only with much effort from the parent. It takes your solid commitment as an adult and a few months of practice.

Infant potty training is a true test of instinct. Most mothers instinctively identify patterns when their infants need to go. As a rule of the thumbScience Articles, infant potty training is all about communication between you and your baby. So be prepared for some long bonding time.

The controversy of this concept should not really create confusion especially to mothers looking for ways to explore their child’s abilities. It is only dependent with the parent to test what best works with their beloved babies.

The Fluoride In Our Drinking Water Controversy

Monday, October 6th, 2008

For over 30 years, the controversy has raged about the benefits or the hazards of human consumption of fluoride. Despite numerous studies conducted by such organizations as the World Health Organization (WHO) we seem to be no closer to definitive answers to the question of whether fluoride in our drinking water really does prevent tooth decay or if it is, in fact, contributing to major health problems like cancer and osteoporosis.

Fluoride occurs naturally in drinking water is some areas of the world, including parts of the United Stated and Canada. Many cities and towns also add fluoride to the drinking water supply during water treatment. The addition of fluoride to drinking water began in the 1940’s because it was believed that fluoride prevents tooth decay. Since that time, many studies have been conducted and there is evidence that fluoride does play a part in preventing tooth decay although it is believed that with the level of dental hygiene practiced today in the developed world the addition of fluoride to the water supply is unnecessary. On a more sinister side, other studies have concluded the fluoride may cause some very serious health problems. The following quotation is taken from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website.

“Many communities add fluoride to their drinking water to promote dental health. Each community makes its own decision about whether or not to add fluoride. EPA has set an enforceable drinking water standard for fluoride of 4 mg/L (some people who drink water containing fluoride in excess of this level over many years could get bone disease,including pain and tenderness of the bones). EPA has also set a secondary fluoride standard of 2 mg/L to protect against dental fluorosis. Dental fluorosis, in its moderate or severe forms, may result in a brown staining and/or pitting of the permanent teeth. This problem occurs only in developing teeth, before they erupt from the gums. Children under nine should not drink water that has more than 2 mg/L of fluoride.

”The EPA regulates the level of fluoride in drinking water because it recognizes the potential health hazards of the consumption of too much fluoride. Several countries in Europe, such as Sweden, France and Ireland have gone even further and sought medical advice from some very prestigious institutes such as the Nobel Medical Institute that recommends against fluoridation of drinking water and these countries have stopped adding fluoride to their drinking water.

A Harvard Study of boys drinking fluoridated vs. unfluoridated water, released April 5, 2006 concluded that boys who drink water with levels of fluoride considered safe by federal (EPA) guidelines are five times more likely to have a rare bone cancer than boys who drink unfluoridated water.

Dr. Hardy Limeback B.SC., Ph.D. in Biochemistry, D.D.S., head of the Department of Preventive Dentistry for the University of Toronto, and president of the Canadian Association for Dental Research states that “Children under three should never use fluoridated toothpaste,” he counseled. “Or drink fluoridated water. And baby formula must never be made up using Toronto tap water. Never.

“Even if we accept that the addition of fluoride at the EPA regulated levels, 1.4 and 2.4 parts per million (ppm) is save and will not increase our risks of developing bone or other rare cancers, we also need to consider the fact that many beverages we drink also contribute to the amount of fluoride we consume on a daily basis. In a study of fluoride levels in fruit juices, over 42% of the fruit juices tested were found to contain fluoride at over 1 ppm with some juices, particularly grape juices, as high a 3.0 ppm.

There seems to be as many scientists advocating fluoride as there are issuing warnings about it. In the meantime, we are left without clear answers about this long standing controversy. For those concerned about the potential health risks posed by fluoride consumption, or families with small childrenComputer Technology Articles, home water filters can be installed that are very economical and very effective at removing fluoride from drinking water.

Why Pregnant Barbie Doll is Being Rocked by Controversy

Friday, June 6th, 2008

It seems as if the world of Barbie is being rocked by controversy. Currently there is a Barbie doll that is depicted as being pregnant. This doll is not however an actual Barbie doll but one of Barbieโ€™s friends. This doll friend is called Midge and she is portrayed as being married and already having a another child. The controversy is because many people seem to feel that this is a wrong move by Mattel.

Of course just as there are detractors to this doll there are also people who feel that there is nothing wrong with the production of this pregnant Barbie doll. Now the interesting fact you will find from this doll is the detachable tummy where the Barbie dollโ€™s baby is supposed to be. In all probability many stores will withdraw this Barbie doll as there are many people who seem opposed to the idea of a little girlโ€™s doll being depicted as being ready to have a child.

It is difficult to know if this interesting move by Mattel is a wise one as the Barbie doll brand is one that girls do want to buy. Perhaps this is yet another Barbie doll that will become a collectorโ€™s doll like the Nabisco Oreo Fun Time Barbie doll after it was withdrawn. Regardless of this fact is the idea behind what parents see and feel when their daughters ask why Barbie has a large tummy.

While the Mattel Company is not saying anything about the production of this pregnant Barbie friend there are lots of items that you can find in the internet and among parents who feel this doll may produce some negative ideas in their daughters. The most common concern is that the various young girls who have this doll will feel that it is alright for them to become pregnant as their doll โ€“ who is portrayed as being a role model โ€“ is going to be a mummy.

Now this is a valid concern if you feel that your daughter may be misled but then again this attitude belittles the girls who want to have dolls like this. After all there are scores of girls who have baby dolls to feed, rock to sleep, clean and change their diapers. There are lots of children who are more aware of how a baby comes into the world when their motherโ€™s stomach has shrunk back to a normal size.

With all of these events occurring all around the children we can be forgiven if we feel the need to shelter our daughters. But then again if we have done our tasks of being parents properly our children will just see this pregnant Barbie doll as being only a doll and not a role model to follow after into disaster.